![]() |
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
From Wolf to Woof Less than 14,000 years separates the wolf (canine lupus) – the dog’s ancestor and the canines we now have living with us of which there are hundreds of breeds of today’s Canis familiaris. The co-operative relationship of both transformed wild canids into the first ‘domesticated’ animal – the tameable and incredibly variable dog. A Mutual Connection About 12,000 years ago hunter-gathers in what is now Israel placed a body in a grave with it’s hand cradling a pup. Whether it was a dog or a wolf cannot be known. Either way the burial is among the earliest fossil evidence of the canines’ domestication. Scientists know the process was underway by about 14,000 years ago but do not agree on why. Some argue that humans adopted wolf pups and that natural selection favoured those less aggressive. Others say dogs domesticated themselves by adapting to a new niche – human refuse dumps. Personally I believe that if a free meal is offered without having to hunt 20 miles, without risking your life and you don’t know where your next meal to survive is coming from, the opportunity to eat easily from cave dwellers leftovers was a bonus in favour of the wolf. For our ancestors at that time, the wolf’s remarkable hearing and superior nose became a considerable companion and a welcome alliance in an aide for the survival of both. The wolves hunting ability made it easier for man to follow and enjoy the spoils of the kill. This co-operative partnership made sense. Opportunist canids that were less likely to flee from people survived this niche and succeeding generations became increasingly tame. According to biologist Raymond Coppinger; “At the molecular level not much changed at all: that wolves and dogs are almost identical.” In fact we now know just 0.02% in their D.N.A away. Breeds Apart - One species, hundreds of faces No other species displays more diversity than the dog. Yet all dog breeds share certain characteristics born of their common origin. The establishment of kennel clubs since the 1800’s accelerated the process of artificial selection by encouraging new breeds. Most breeds were created simply for the sake of appearance however, we are now becoming aware not for the welfare and well being of all breeds. We have created breeds with physical defects that are now we are beginning to find unacceptable based on continual medical problems. The canids developed from the wolf over thousands of years no longer needed to bring down big prey. Dogs developed skulls and teeth that were smaller relative to their overall size than a wolf’s. Having gone from a diet of meat to eating human leftovers they developed into what we now recognise as the mongrel or mutt – similar in size to a medium size, often golden coloured dogs that scavenge on the edges of towns worldwide. Environment also shaped early breeds. In colder climates larger dogs with dense coats could survive better e.g. the Husky and Spitz breeds. Hotter climates produced sleeker coated, more streamlined dogs like the Saluki & Greyhound breeds better able to cope with a warmer climate. Over the centuries humans began to cross breed animals with what they considered to be desirable traits to produce hybrids, creating variation in shapes that would appear to survive in nature without reference for the health or well being of their creations. The skeletons of a Great Dane and a Chihuahua still have the same number of bones, 360. They still think the same; we didn’t thankfully change the muscle called the brain. So it is we created hybrids of the original canine - the wolf; altered its surroundings and called it ‘domesticated’ and set it unjustly apart from its ancestor. The wolf is as domesticated to it’s surroundings as a dog is indigenous to it’s. Never forgetting that every canine is born a free thinking being fully capable of making decisions for it’s own survival. Dogs are adaptable as all species must be to survive, if we think they're not take a look at this footage and then tell me "dogs don't get it!" No one taught them but just as they can adapt to our world, so we can adapt to there's- by thinking differently. You've got to give something you never gave to get something you never had and I believe in letting the dog come up with the ideas by offering the chance to make good choices for both the dog and it's human. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2002/01/dogs/dogs-photography (Selected parts of this text were sourced from the editorial National Geographic) Moscow Dogs: STRAY dogs are commuting to and from a city centre on underground trains in search of food scraps. Dr. Poiarkov told how the dogs like to play during their daily commute. The dogs have learned to use traffic lights to cross the road safely, said Dr. Poiarkov. And they use cunning tactics to obtain tasty morsels of shawarma, a kebab-like snack popular in Moscow.
They sneak up behind people eating shawarmas then bark loudly to shock them into dropping their food. Today: Today, as we have become more desensitised than ever to the companion living with us, we have even denied the dog it’s nature and it’s intelligence. In many aspects of our human daily lives it’s considered the problem of the dog when it can’t deliver our expected behaviour. The problems we perceive as being those of the dog in our human world are in fact our perceptions of the dog living in a world we have made for it, an unnatural world. A dog’s loyalty to its pack is unquestioned therefore it stays, desperately trying to train all members. So behaviours, unexpected by us develop, until the dog quickly becomes a stressed animal – desperately trying to do the job we’ve given it. |
|
||||||
![]() |
|||||||